Post a comment for an additional 5% off our already-low prices!
Post a comment on one of our news articles, or a review of a product you've ordered from us in our Mercantile, and we'll email you a COUPON CODE good for 5% off on your next purchase.
The fine print: Your comment or product review must be relevant to the subject or product to which you're posting. Once we've reviewed and approved your comment, we'll email you a Coupon Code, usually within 72 hours, that you can use on your next purchase in our Mercantile. We're a family oriented Website, so keep the language to PG, be polite, and try to avoid snarkiness. Coupon Codes cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer or coupon code, are good for one purchase only and do not have an expiration date. This offer is subject to end at any time.
NoseFrida Snot Suckers now available in our Mercantile
Written by GentleNurturing.com
Thursday, 15 July 2010
The NoseFrida Aspirator, affectionately known as "The Snot Sucker" in now available in the GentleNurturing.com Mercantile!
It's smart, it's Swedish, it's snot as gross as it looks. It's a nasal aspirator that actually works!
Developed by Ear, Nose, and Throat Specialists and Pediatricians, NoseFrida has been used in Europe for over a decade. Doctors prefer NoseFrida because it is designed to be placed against the nostril, forming a seal, rather than be inserted inside the nostril like bulb aspirators. This ensures that the child's tender nasal lining is not damaged by poking.
NoseFrida is designed to be safe and effective for newborns as well as toddlers.
Nosefrida is better and safer than other aspirators on the market. Since you never put anything inside the nose, and you control the amount of suction you apply, it does not irritate the sensitive lining of the nose. Children tolerate NoseFrida better than other aspirators.
The ingeniously simple design features a 15 inch clear plastic tube that extends from a nasal nozzle. Parents use the red mouth piece to suck the snot right out without risk of bacterial transfer. Disposable filters prevent the user from catching the child's cold.
NoseFrida is made of a non-allergenic, latex-free polypropylene, and is BPA and phthalate free. Also, it is easy to clean and safe to use.
Order NoseFrida today and find out for yourself why doctors are recommending it, magazines are raving, and parents are finally getting some sleep.
It's a nasal aspirator that ACTUALLY WORKS!
It's doctor-invented and doctor-recommended (Dr. Sears and more).
Lobbying fight over infant formula highlights budget gridlock
Written by Ruth Marcus, The Washington Post
Wednesday, 14 July 2010
Sometimes an obscure lobbying fight tells a larger story. This phenomenon is playing out right now on the unlikely issue of infant formula—and the broader, disturbing lesson is how hard it is to take even the most common-sense steps to save taxpayer dollars.
Starting in 2002, formula makers began to offer products with additives—docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA)—to replicate fatty acids in breast milk. Not surprisingly, these formulas cost more. The Agriculture Department, which oversees WIC, allowed state programs to decide what formula to buy. Not surprisingly, formula makers lobbied states to spring for the souped-up versions.
And, perhaps not coincidentally, when WIC was reauthorized in 2004, Congress tucked in language telling states that when soliciting bids for infant formula, they could not require manufacturers to include or omit specific ingredients.
You can guess what happened next: Formula makers began submitting bids only for the costlier products. A February 2010 Agriculture Department study pegged the added cost at $91 million annually, more than a tenth of the infant formula budget. Now new formulas with even more ingredients—and even higher prices—are being offered through WIC.
Written by Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau
Monday, 12 July 2010
Sen. Dianne Feinstein's insistence that a sweeping food safety bill include a ban on bisphenol A, a chemical widely used to line food cans, threatens a top White House priority.
The California Democrat contends that any legislation aimed at protecting food safety should include limits on the compound, known as BPA.
If she succeeds, the food and chemical industries have promised to defeat the food safety bill, which would expand the powers of the Food and Drug Administration over food processing and production to prevent food contamination, trace outbreaks and enforce recalls.
The California Assembly recently passed a ban on the chemical similar to the one Feinstein wants nationwide.
"No chemical should be used in food products until it is proved safe," Feinstein said.
BPA is integral to the epoxy resins used to line metal food cans and lids of glass jars, as well as reusable clear plastic water and baby bottles.
Feinstein cites studies claiming a link between BPA, which can mimic the effects of the female hormone estrogen, to "precocious puberty" in American girls, who are developing breasts at about age 9 1/2 - about a year earlier than prior generations.
When a bill to ban a common plastic additive in feeding products for young children passed the Assembly on July 1, it marked a milestone in state legislative efforts to regulate bisphenol A.
The ban's supporters point to studies linking the chemical, found in hard plastic containers such as baby bottles and in the lining of food and beverage cans, with numerous adverse health effects, especially in infants and young children.
The bill, SB 797, was defeated last year in the Assembly. In 2008, a similar bill written by another state senator also failed.
But Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, the bill's author, asked for another vote this year, and this time it passed 43-31. Mostly Republicans opposed it, along with a few Democrats, including Alberto Torrico, D-Fremont.
"I'm thrilled. This was a real David and Goliath fight," said Pavley, referring to what she called a battle over the bill with industry lobbyists.
It calls for a ban on the chemical by January 2012 in feeding products designed for children aged 3 and under, such as sippy cups, bottles and baby food jars. It also bans BPA in all infant formula starting July 2012.
The bill heads back the state Senate, where it already passed, for a reconciliation vote in August. If approved again there, it goes to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
In the weeks ahead, Pavley's staff expects intense lobbying by industry groups opposed to the bill.
For 20+ years, scientists have proven the harmful effects of bisphenol-A (BPA), a synthetic estrogen found in everyday products. [figure correction]
According to experts if you have been living in Europe or the US it is highly probable that you have BPA in your system as 90% of Europeans and Americans have detectable amounts.
Plus 3,175 million tons of BPA are produced annually, an alarming rise according to a petrochemical consulting firm Chemical Market Associates, Inc.'s (CMAI) figures when only 2.8 million tons was produced globally in 2002.
These tons of BPA ends up in a number of consumer goods including polycarbonate plastic products (reusable water bottles, sippy cups, leftover containers, baby bottles, toys), the lining of canned foods, baby formula and beverages, pizza boxes and other fast food containers, non-metal dental fillings, thermal paper (receipts), some medical devices and even leached into beaches' sand and water.
Here are some tips to limit your BPA exposure:
Avoid drinking canned sodas, beers.
Opt for bottled waters and other plastics with the recycling labels #1, #2 and #4 on the bottom and avoid those with PC or #7.
Wash plastics by hand or on the top shelf of your dishwasher.
Do not microwaves plastics.
Eat fresh foods as much as possible and avoid canned foods (especially pasta, meats and soups).
Try to stay away from receipts (sometimes it can be emailed) and carbonless paper, if you handle a large amount of receipts wash your hands often and try wearing gloves.
The secret is out: the toxic chemicals industry is designing a PR campaign for survival! Bisphenol A in baby bottles, water bottles, and food cans. Formaldehyde in furniture. Phthalates in air fresheners, soft plastics, and fragrances. The manufacturers of these chemicals are not taking the push for regulation lying down (despite their public claims of support for safety). Don’t be duped!
View the video the Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families coalition created to galvanize public support for Congressional action, and have fun with a pretty serious issue. The characters you will meet in the video are cartoons, but the plot is ripped straight from the headlines. (Just go to the industry funded “Coalition for Chemical Safety” or read one of Richard Dennison's exposes and you’ll see what we mean.)
Chemicals aren’t sitting still – and neither should we!
CPSC warns parents of dangers of open windows for children (includes window safety tips)
Written by Angele Sionna, Early Childhood Parenting Examiner
Thursday, 08 July 2010
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is warning parents to be vigilant about keeping children away from open windows - screens or not. With energy prices up and the economy down, it seems more parents have been opening windows this summer because there are more kids accidentally falling out of them.
The CPSC reports that in recent weeks, several children have fallen from windows around the US.
"Window falls increase dramatically during the spring and summer months but they can be prevented," said Chrissy Cianflone, Director of Programs for Safe Kids USA. "It takes active supervision on the part of the parent or caregiver, and a device called a window guard. Screens are meant to keep bugs out, not kids in. Window guards are easy to install and have a release mechanism in the event of an emergency."
On average, about eight deaths occur yearly to children five years or younger while an estimated 3,300 children five and younger are treated each year in U.S. hospital emergency departments. Hospitalization was required for about 34 percent of these children after falling from a window, says the CPSC. This is why they rate windows as one of the "Top 5 Home Hazards."
Adult testicular function affected by exposure in womb to BPA
Written by Kate Melville, Science a Gogo
Tuesday, 06 July 2010
Low-level exposure in the womb to the plastic chemical bisphenol A (BPA) can harm testicular function into adulthood, according to a new study from Auburn University that adds to the growing list of concerns about the ubiquitous chemical. The results were presented yesterday at The Endocrine Society's 92nd Annual Meeting.
"We are seeing changes in the testis function of rats after exposure to BPA levels that are lower than what the FDA and EPA consider safe exposure levels for humans," said Benson Akingbemi, the study's lead author. "This is concerning because large segments of the population, including pregnant and nursing mothers, are exposed to this chemical."
BPA, found in many plastic products such as drink bottles, acts in a similar manner as the female sex hormone estrogen and has been linked to female infertility. It is present in placental tissue and is able to pass from a mother into her breast milk.
In the new study, Akingbemi and colleagues saw the effects of BPA at the cellular level; specifically in Leydig cells (Leydig cells are responsible for testosterone secretion). Akingbemi explained that the process of testosterone secretion was decreased in the male offspring of female rats that received BPA during pregnancy and while nursing.
For the study, the mothers were fed BPA in olive oil at a dose of either 2.5 or 25 micrograms of BPA per kilogram of body weight. The daily upper limit of safe exposure for humans, according to federal guidelines, is 50 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. A control group of pregnant rats received olive oil without BPA.
The investigators then studied the development of Leydig cells in the male offspring. The capacity for testosterone secretion was assessed at 21, 35 and 90 days of age. The amount of testosterone secreted per Leydig cell was found to be much lower in male offspring after early-life exposure to BPA than in offspring from control unexposed animals.
'What's that harmful ingredient I should avoid?" "Which type of sunscreen should I choose?" These are frequent questions you're asking when you're in the shopping aisle, and EWG is committed to being there when it counts.
EWG has just launched a free mobile application of our 2010 Sunscreen Guide that goes anywhere with your iPhone and will help you shop smarter this vacation season. Our guide includes the current crop of more than 500 beach and sport sunscreens analyzed by EWG. Using a simple ranking system, this must-have app makes it easy to find a safe and effective sunscreen this season.
We are committed to providing you with the information you need to make healthy choices for yourself and your family, whether you are at home or on the go. Thanks to a generous donor, EWG was able to develop this iPhone application, aimed at saving you time during this busy season. We hope you'll give it a try!
Sincerely,
Ken Cook
President, Environmental Working Group
The Environmental Working Group is a non-profit, non-partisan research organization dedicated to using the power of information to protect human health and the environment. The EWG Action Fund is a legislative advocacy organization that uses EWG research to promote healthy and sustainable policies.
HEADQUARTERS 1436 U St. NW, Suite 100 | Washington, DC 20009 | (202) 667-6982
Revealed: The poison fed to Aussie babies every day
Written by Simon Kearney, The Sunday Telegraph
Sunday, 04 July 2010
CONFIDENTIAL emails reveal Australia's food regulator discussed hiding from the Federal Government international warnings about a potentially dangerous chemical used in plastic bottles.
The chemical, Bisphenol A (BPA), is found in plastic packaging. Latest research in the US says it may harm brain development and the prostate gland.
Australian stores last week began a voluntary phase-out of plastic baby bottles containing the substance, but Food Standards Australia New Zealand has long declared it safe.
A draft report to Parliamentary Secretary for Health Mark Butler includes comments indicating that the agency considered covering up international concerns.
"Maybe too sensitive for the Minister to see," one comment says. Another comment, on industry moves to phase out products containing BPA, warns: "Would delete this - we do not want to be encouraging withdrawal of something we deem safe."
The emails were written in January, at the same time as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched new research into the safety of products containing BPA.
The health of California’s children was represented today in Sacramento when a majority of the State Assembly voted to remove the toxic chemical bisphenol A (BPA) from food and beverage containers designed for children 3 and younger.
Forty-three lawmakers voted to pass the “Toxics-Free Babies and Toddlers Act” (SB 797) originally authored by State Senator Fran Pavley (D-Santa Monica). Pavley’s bill, which was already approved by the Senate, now goes back to the upper chamber for a final procedural vote where it is expected to pass before heading to the Governor for his consideration.
Senator Pavley authored the legislation in response to mounting scientific evidence that exposure to even very low levels of BPA can impact health. More than 200 scientific studies show that BPA exposure, particularly during early infancy, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects later in life, including breast and prostate cancer, birth defects, infertility in men, early puberty in girls, diabetes and obesity.
The main route of exposure in humans is from food and beverage containers where BPA leaches from the hard plastic.
“The chemical industry may have had the money, but science and the public’s concern for children’s health came out on top today,” said the director of EWG’s California office, Renee Sharp. “California parents are closer than ever to that day when they won’t have to worry if their babies and toddlers are ingesting BPA.”
What’s That Smell? Hidden Fragrance Found in Cleaning Products
Written by Healthy Child
Thursday, 01 July 2010
“There’s no reason to be putting the health of American consumers at risk because of a legal loophole. We need to update our laws so that moms and dads can get the information they need to make choices about what they bring into their homes.”
—Senator Al Franken (D-MN)
In the first report examining the health effects of fragrance chemicals in cleaning products, the national non-profit, Women’s Voices for the Earth, has drawn attention to top-selling detergents, air fresheners and spray cleaners. These products contain secret fragrance chemicals that are not required to be listed on the label, and which are linked to allergic reactions, respiratory disorders, reduced fertility and birth defects.
"People need to understand the hazards of fragranced products to themselves, to others, and to the environment. This important report provides illuminating evidence of these widespread hazards,” says Anne Steinemann, Ph.D, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Professor of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
The report “What’s That Smell”(PDF) points to a number of scientific studies that demonstrate the potential of fragrance chemicals to cause long-term health impacts, casting doubt on their safety. The presence of these chemicals in everyday cleaners, which impact almost all Americans, shows that chemicals remain largely unregulated due to weak laws governing their use and safety.
For this report, Women’s Voices for the Earth compiled 37 peer-reviewed scientific studies, and highlighted the chemicals that pose significant risk: phthalates and synthetic musks. Phthalates have been associated with hormone disruption, sperm damage, birth defects and feminization of boys. Synthetic musks have been found to enhance the effects of other chemicals entering the body.
Post a comment for an additional 5% off our already-low prices!
Post a comment on one of our news articles, or a review of a product you've ordered from us in our Mercantile, and we'll email you a COUPON CODE good for 5% off on your next purchase.
The fine print: Your comment or product review must be relevant to the subject or product to which you're posting. Once we've reviewed and approved your comment, we'll email you a Coupon Code, usually within 72 hours, that you can use on your next purchase in our Mercantile. We're a family oriented Website, so keep the language to PG, be polite, and try to avoid snarkiness. Coupon Codes cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer or coupon code, are good for one purchase only and do not have an expiration date. This offer is subject to end at any time.